info@pdprogram.org
Donate now
Urgent Needs for Parkinson's Patients

Evaluation Form

Parkinson’s Disease – A Comprehensive Update for Primary Care Physicians

To help us plan the best possible symposium in the future, please complete this evaluation. Circle a number from 1 to 5 indicating your degree of satisfaction with each description below, with 1 being the lowest and 5 being the highest degree of satisfaction.

GENERAL

Low Satisfaction

High Satisfaction

The program content was relevant to family medicine
The program content was relevant to family medicine The program content enhanced my knowledge
The program content met my expectations
The program was well organized
Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest was clearly communicated
There were adequate opportunities to interact with my peers
There were adequate opportunities to interact with faculty
I will use the information I learned in my future practice
Usefulness of the handouts/binder
Quality of the audio/visual
Physical environment (rooms, set up, food, etc.)
The program met the stated objectives. At the end of the conference, attendees will better understand:
The gaps in diagnosis and management of Parkinson’s Disease (PD) in primary care practice
Motor and non-motor symptoms of PD
How to effectively manage patient complications related to PD
The psychiatric complication faced by patients with PD
Please indicate which CanMEDS-FM Roles you felt were addressed during this educational activity
Please indicate which CanMEDS-FM Roles you felt were addressed during this educational activity
Challenges Faced by General Practitioners in Diagnosing and Managing Parkinson’s Disease – Dr. Nicholas Cothros
Quality and clarity of information
Content was relevant to my practice
Discussion time was adequate
Met Stated Objectives:
Was sufficient time provided to review the presenter’s disclosure slides?
This session was free of commercial bias If no, please describe perceived bias:
Signs and Symptoms of Early and Late-Stage Parkinson’s Disease: Motor and Non-motor – Dr. A.Q. Rana
Quality and clarity of information
Content was relevant to my practice
Discussion time was adequate
Met Stated Objectives:
Was sufficient time provided to review the presenter’s disclosure slides?
This session was free of commercial bias If no, please describe perceived bias:
Mental Health and Parkinson’s Disease – Dr. Mateusz Zurowski
Quality and clarity of information
Content was relevant to my practice
Discussion time was adequate
Met stated objectives:
Was sufficient time provided to review the presenter’s disclosure slides?
This session was free of commercial bias If no, please describe perceived bias:
Differential Diagnosis, Treatment Options and the Role of Medication – Dr. Renato Munhoz
Quality and clarity of information
Content was relevant to my practice
Discussion time was adequate
Met stated objectives:
Was sufficient time provided to review the presenter’s disclosure slides?
This session was free of commercial bias If no, please describe perceived bias:
Q&A – Moderated by Dr. Basel Bari
Moderator was well informed
Moderator spoke clearly
Moderator managed time well
Sufficient time was provided for each question and response
This symposium was credible and non-biased: